Mr S Farooq v J Mclaughlin Group Ltd and K McLaughlin: 2402778/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2402778/2022
Mr S FarooqClaimantJ Mclaughlin Group Ltd (1) Karen McLaughlin (2)Respondent
Employment Judge Phil Allen DateDate 21 December 2022

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The first respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The first respondent (J Mclaughlin Group Ltd) has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £870.52.[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the first respondent (J Mclaughlin Group Ltd) is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £444.84.[4]The first respondent (J Mclaughlin Group Ltd) has breached the claimant’s contract by failing to reimburse him for expenses incurred and is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £90.61.[5]The first respondent (J Mclaughlin Group Ltd) has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £533.80.