Miss J A McGowan (formerly Ms J A McGowan Fitton) and others v Bury Metropolitan Borough Council: 2402619/2010 and others
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimants need permission to amend their claims so as to argue that the difference between their pay and that of driver/attendants was due to a provision, criterion or practice of remunerating roles, in general, at higher pay for roles based at a vehicle depot than for roles based at a day care centre.[2]Permission to amend their claims in this respect is refused.[3]The claims are struck out on the ground that they have no reasonable prospect of success.[4]The tribunal has in any event no jurisdiction to consider the claim of Mr Tuohy because it was presented after the expiry of the statutory time limit. Case No. 2402619/2010 2415284/2012 2415287/2012 2400980/2008 2408624/2011 2409608/2008 2408449/2011[5]The respondent’s application for costs is refused. 23 November 2018