Mr S Bailey v UK Debt Help Ltd: 2402373/2019 and 2411122/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The application by the respondent to have some of the claims of the claimant struck out and/or a deposit order made fails and is dismissed.[2]The application by the claimant that the ET3 and counterclaim should not be allowed to proceed, as they were lodged out of time, also fails and is dismissed.[3]Further directions have been made with regard to this case at a closed Preliminary Hearing which immediately followed this hearing of the same date. Those directions have been issued in order to bring these matters on for trial.[1]The claimant’s claims are not struck out under the auspices of the Unless Order. I find that the Unless Order has been complied with.[2]The claimant's claims are not struck out because they have been actively pursued, the Tribunal orders have been substantially complied with and the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted has been acceptable, and I cannot say at this stage whether the claims have no or little reasonable prospect of success.