Mr S Bradbury v Safezone Construction Ltd and others: 2402243/2019
JUDGMENT
The proceedings against these respondents are dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The claims against John Timothy Hallisey , and John Hallisey t/a Argento are unaffected, and proceed, subject to the stay ordered by the Tribunal. Employment Judge Holmes Dated: 4 July 2019 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 17 July 2019 Miss E Heeks ........................................................................................ ........................................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 2402243/2019 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr S Bradbury Respondent: 1. John Timothy Hallisey[2]John Hallisey Trading As ArgentoREASONS
[1]By a letter dated 23 October 2019 and 23 November 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because• the claimant had not complied with the case management order 3 of the Tribunal made on 1 July 2019.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, as to why this should not be done. The claims are therefore struck out.