Mrs S Lalmohamed v Garvins Law Ltd: 2401941/2020

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2401941/2020
Mrs S LalmohamedClaimantGarvins Law LtdRespondent
Employment Judge Phil AllenIn person for claimantMs A Rumble (instructed by counsel) for respondentDate 27 January 2022

JUDGMENT

[1]The claimant was not subjected to a detriment by the respondent due to a protected act. The claim for victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 does not succeed and is dismissed.[2]The claimant did not terminate her contract of employment with the respondent in circumstances in which she was entitled to terminate it without notice by reason of the respondent’s conduct and therefore she was not dismissed within the meaning given in section 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claim for unfair dismissal does not succeed and is dismissed.