J Martin v Harley Ultrasound Ltd and Harley Ultrasound T/a ‘Vivo’: 2401309/2024
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The respondents have failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment from the first respondent of £1179.66.[3]The first respondent breached the claimant’s contract of employment by failing to pay pension contributions due and the first respondent is ordered to pay the claimant damages in the sum of £169.89.[4]The claims against the second respondent are dismissed, as a result of the Judgments made against the first respondent.[5]The hearing listed on 21st May 2024 is cancelled.