Mr J Lockton v Mr A Clugston: 2401150/2020
JUDGMENT
The claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The claims of disability discrimination and for notice pay shall proceed to a preliminary hearing as listed on 19 October 2020. _____________________________ Employment Judge Batten 26 May 2020 ORDER SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 10 June 2020 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 2401150/2020(A) 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr J Lockton v Mr A Clugston trading as Multi Trade Solutions North West Heard at: Manchester (by telephone) On: 6 January 2021 Before: Employment Judge Johnson Appearances For the Claimant: in person (and supported by his mother Mrs M Gribbin) For the Respondent: in person JUDGMENT[1]The claimant is disabled in accordance with section 6(1) Equality Act 2010 by reason of Crohn’s disease from January 2019 and he has remained disabled since that date because this is a lifelong condition. _____________________________ Employment Judge Johnson Date: …6 January 2021…………. Sent to the parties on: Date: 6 February 2021 ............................................................ For the Tribunal Office Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case No: 2401150/2020 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr J Lockton Respondent: Mr A Clugston trading as Multi Trade Solutions North HELD AT: Manchester ON: 19 & 20 July 2021 BEFORE: Employment Judge Johnson MEMBERS: Mr M Stemp Mr D Mockford REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Mrs M Gribbin (mother) Respondent: unrepresented[1]The complaint of disability discrimination is not well founded and is dismissed. This means that all forms of discrimination alleged by the claimant are unsuccessful.[2]The complaint of breach of contract is not well founded and is dismissed because the respondent was entitled to dismiss the claimant without notice because of an act of gross misconduct. This means that the complaint of breach of contract is unsuccessful.