M Lobanov and E Hul v Moderix Ltd: 2400575/2025 and 2400576/2025
JUDGMENT
[1]The claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 17 February 2025. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made in each of the claims in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. M Lobanov[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £2,747.25 gross.[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £5,741.16.[4]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,071.84 (statutory redundancy pay: 8 weeks x £633.98 per week).[5]The respondent must pay the claimant £13,560.25 in total. E Hul[6]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £2,400.00 gross.[7]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £2,334.93.[8]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,492.33 (statutory redundancy pay: 4.5 weeks x £553.85 per week).[9]The respondent must pay the claimant £7,227.26 in total.