Miss H Selby v S Rainford and others: 2400539/2022
JUDGMENT
The claimant’s employer is found to have been the second respondent, ‘Charlotte Rainford by her deputy Potter Rees Dolan Trust Corporation Limited’. The claimant is found not to have been employed by the first respondent, Susan Rainford, or by the third respondent, Ian Rainford. The claimant’s claims are for notice pay, sick pay and holiday. These claims can only be pursued against the claimant’s employer. Accordingly, the claims against the first respondent (Susan Rainford) and the third respondent (Ian Rainford) cannot be pursued and are dismissed. 1 of 2 Case Number: 2400539/22 The claimant confirmed that her claims against the second respondent (Charlotte Rainford by her deputy Potter Rees Dolan Trust Corporation Limited) were withdrawn. The claimant’s claims against Charlotte Rainford by her deputy Potter Rees Dolan Trust Corporation Limited were therefore dismissed. For the avoidance of doubt, all claims pursued by the claimant have been dismissed, for various reasons, by this judgment.