Mr A Pitman v Anytime Fitness Crawley: 2306875/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2306875/2024
Mr A PitmanClaimantAnytime FitnessRespondent
Employment Judge AspinallIn person for claimantNot in attendance for respondentDate 14 February 2025

JUDGMENT

The complaint of Unfair Dismissal is struck out.

REASONS

[1]By a letter dated 23 September 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of unfair dismissal should not be struck out because It appears from your claim that you were employed for less than two years. If so, the Tribunal cannot consider your complaint that you were unfairly dismissed.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done. The complaint of unfair dismissal is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claim remains listed for hearing on 14 February 2025. Approved by: Employment Judge Aspinall Date: 27 January 2025 Case Numbers: 2306875/2024 1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimants: Mr A Pitman Respondents: Anytime Fitness Crawley Heard at: London South (by CVP) On: 14 February 2025 Before: Employment Judge Harrington REPRESENTATION: Claimant: In person Respondent: Not in attendance[1]The Claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is wellfounded. The Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant’s wages in the period 17 – 24 June 2024.[2]The Respondent shall pay the Claimant £457.60, which is the gross sum deducted. The Claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance. Employment Judge Harrington 14 February 2025 Case Numbers: 2306875/2024 2 of 2 Note Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.