Mrs Y M Liu v Y C Dai: 2305145/2021

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2305145/2021
Mrs Y M LiuClaimantYue Chang DaiRespondent
Employment Judge TsamadosDate 4 April 2022

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 13 October 2021. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made on part of the claim, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure. The Unfair Dismissal part of the claim will proceed to a Hearing as notified.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £60.00 net.[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £720.00 net. This figure is calculated using the Statutory minimum entitlements within section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.[4]The respondent must pay the claimant £780.00 in total.[5]The claimant is responsible for any figures owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions. _____________________________ Employment Judge Tsamados Date: 04 April 2022 Case No: 2305145/2021 10.15 Certificate of Correction – rule 69 March 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs Y M Liu Respondent: Mr Yue Chang Dai CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of Rule 69, the Judgment sent to the parties on , is corrected as set out in block type correcting the spelling of both the Claimant and Respondent names now correctly showing as Mrs Y M Liu and Mr Yue Chang Dai. _____________________________ Employment Judge Hill ______________________________ Date 04 January 2024 Case No. 2305145/2021 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs Y M Lui Mrs Y M Liu Respondent: Mr Yue Dhang Dai Mr Yue Chang Dai Heard at: London South On: 08 December 2022 Before: Employment Judge Hill REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Respondent: Mr J Lui (Son) In person Not in attendance CORRECTED JUDGMENT Under the provisions of Rule 69, the judgment dated 08 December 2022 is corrected as set out above in bold type.[1]The Claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant compensation in the sum of £15,278.48 calculated as follows: Basic Award 2 weeks x £360 £720 Loss of Statutory Rights £360 Case No. 2305145/2021 2 Compensatory Award Loss of earnings from 18 August 202108 December 2022 (2 weeks’ notice already awarded) 68 weeks @ £360 £24,480.00 Less earnings from new employment £13,337.22 Sub Total £11,142.78 Uplift for failure to follow ACAS Code 25% £3,055.70 Total Award £15,278.48[2]The claimant is responsible for any figures owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.