Mrs W Hyrmak v Mitie Ltd: 2304524/2018
JUDGMENT
AT OPEN PRELIMINARY HEARING The judgment of the Tribunal is as follows:[1]The Respondent’s submission to strike out of the claim for non-compliance with the case management orders of the Employment Tribunal is refused. A separate Unless Order is made to secure compliance.[2]The Respondent’s submission to strike out of the claim for want of reasonable prospects of success is refused.[3]The Respondent’s submission for a Deposit Order as a pre-condition of continuing with the claim is granted and this is dealt with in a separate order. Employment Judge Tsamados Date 25 March 2021 Case No: 2304524/2018 (V) Page 2 of 2 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to Employment Tribunal Judgments All judgments and written reasons for the judgments are published online shortly after a copy has been sent to the Claimant(s) and Respondent(s) in a case. They can be found at: www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Case Number: 2304524/2018 February 2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms W Hrymak Respondent: Mitie Ltd Heard at: Croydon (by cloud video platform) On: 10 to 15 October 2021 Before: Employment Judge Nash Ms J Saunders Mr R Shaw Appearances For the claimant: In person For the first respondent: Mr Baran of counsel Polish interpreter : Mr Konop[4]The respondent did not discriminate against the claimant by failing to comply with a duty to make reasonable adjustments under section 21 Equality Act 2010.[5]The claimant’s deposit of £80 shall be paid to the respondent under rule 39(5)(b) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.[6]The claimant shall pay to the respondent costs of £100 under rule 76 of the 2013 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.