Ms A Cann v KTB Rehabilitation: 2304400/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2304400/2022
Between
Ms A CannClaimantKTB Rehabilitation RULE 21 JUDGMENT 1. The Respondent has not filed an ET3 and the time for doing so has expired. The matter is being dealt with in accordance with Rule 21(2). 2. The Claimant’s claim for Redundancy Pay is well founded. The Respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £2,855 in respect of this head of claim. 3. The Respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant’s pay relating to notice pay. The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the further sum of £3,115 net of tax. 4. The Claimant’s claim for maternity pay is dismissed as an award would represent double recovery alongside the notice pay. 5. The Claimant’s claim for an additional sum to cover the costs of taking out loans is not well founded and is dismissed. Employment Judge D Wright Date: 27 February 2023Respondent
Before
Employment Judge D Wright DateDate 27 February 2023

JUDGMENT

[1]The Respondent has not filed an ET3 and the time for doing so has expired. The matter is being dealt with in accordance with Rule 21(2).[2]The Claimant’s claim for Redundancy Pay is well founded. The Respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £2,855 in respect of this head of claim.[3]The Respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant’s pay relating to notice pay. The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the further sum of £3,115 net of tax.[4]The Claimant’s claim for maternity pay is dismissed as an award would represent double recovery alongside the notice pay.[5]The Claimant’s claim for an additional sum to cover the costs of taking out loans is not well founded and is dismissed.