Mr M Augustin v Greenwich Council: 2304322/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 No response having been entered by the respondent, the claim of unfair dismissal succeeds. The remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing on 3 June 2019 as previously notified. _____________________________ Employment Judge Andrews Date: 22 March 2019[2]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER[3]Case No:2304322/2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr M Augustin Respondent: Greenwich Council[5]Rule 70 the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 The default judgment dated 22 March 2019 has been reconsidered on the Tribunal’s own initiate and revoked.REASONS
[1]When the default Judgment was issued there was no record on the Tribunal file of any response having been entered by the respondent. On 26 March 2019 the respondent provided evidence to the Tribunal that a response had in fact been filed on 18 January 2019 (the last date for filing the same). Accordingly it was inappropriate to issue a default Judgment and it is hereby revoked. The hearing on 3 June 2019 is vacated and will be relisted for 2 days. The parties shall be notified separately of a new hearing date and case management orders. _____________________________ Employment Judge Andrews Date: 29 April 2019 Case Number: 2304322/2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr M Augustin Respondent: Greenwich Council[3]The proceedings are dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant.