Miss G Barlow v Goodlife Barbershop Ltd: 2303642/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2303642/2022
Miss G BarlowClaimantGoodlife Barbershop LtdRespondent
Employment Judge T.R. SmithIn person for claimantNot represented for respondentDate 30 January 2024

JUDGMENT

[1]The claimant was an employee of the respondent for the purposes of sections 230 (1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and section 83 of the Equality Act 2010 from 27 July 2020. 2.The claimant’s complaint of ordinary unfair dismissal is dismissed. 3.The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS code of practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures 2015 and it is just and equitable to increase the awards in respect of the discriminatory dismissal, breach of contract, and the Working Time Regulations 1998 by 25% in accordance with section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. 4.The claimant’s complaint of breach of contract is well-founded and the respondent ordered to pay the claimant forthwith £462.50 as damages for breach of contract (one week’s pay plus 25% uplift). This figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant will have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay. 5.The claimant’s complaint in respect of holiday pay is well-founded. The respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 16 (1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The respondent shall forthwith pay the claimant £4972.50 (53 days plus 25% uplift). The claimant is responsible for paying any tax or national insurance. 6.The claimant’s complaint of an unauthorised deduction from wages is not wellfounded and is dismissed. 7.When the proceedings were begun the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. There are no exceptional circumstances that make an award of an amount equal to 2 weeks gross pay unjust or inequitable. It was just and equitable to make an award of an amount equal to 4 weeks gross pay. In accordance with section 38 of Employment Act 2002 the respondent shall forthwith pay the claimant £1480. 8.The claimant’s complaint of pregnancy and maternity discrimination is well-founded and succeeds:- The tribunal declined to make a recommendation. The respondent shall pay the claimant the following sums: £33850.52 (inclusive of 25% uplift) as compensation for past financial losses and £ 2255.45 Interest on compensation for past financial losses calculated in accordance with the Employment Tribunal’s (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996 and £12500 (£10,000 plus 25% uplift) compensation for injury to feelings and £1668.49 Interest on compensation for injury to feelings calculated in accordance with the Employment Tribunal’s (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996. The above figures are grossed to produce an additional figure of £5068.61.so the total award is £55343.07. 9.The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 as amended do not apply.