Miss M Rangel v Holland & Barrett Retail Ltd: 2303164/2019
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2303164/2019
Between
Miss M RangelClaimantHolland & Barrett Retail LtdRespondent
Before
Employment Judge BalogunIn person for claimantMr Owen-Thomas (instructed by Counsel) for respondentMr C McDevitt (instructed by Counsel) for respondentDate 7 January 2020
JUDGMENT
[1]The correct name of the Respondent is Holland & Barrett Retail Limited and the title to the proceedings is amended accordingly.[2]The application for interim relief is refused. Employment Judge Balogun Date: 11 September 2019 Case Number: 2303164/2019 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL Claimant Miss M Rangel Respondent Holland & Barrett Retail Limited
REASONS
There is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. The contents of the application are an attempt to re-argue the issue. The tribunal took into account the evidence called, and the submissions made by the parties on the day, and gave its reasons extempore. The arguments set out in the reconsideration application do not disclose any arguable basis to reconsider the judgment. Employment Judge Balogun Date: 2 October 2019 Case Number: 2303164/2019 1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL SITTING AT: LONDON SOUTH BEFORE: EMPLOYMENT JUDGE MORTON BETWEEN: Miss M Rangel Claimant AND Holland & Barrett Retail Limited Respondent ON: 7 January 2020 Appearances: For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Mr C McDevitt (Counsel) JUDGMENT[1]The Claimant’s claims under the Equality Act 2010 of age, pregnancy or maternity and marriage or civil partnership discrimination and her claim for unpaid holiday pay under s23 Employment Rights Act 1996 are dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.