Mr W Jachowski v The Lady Eleanor Holles School: 2302993/2024
JUDGMENT
The claimant’s application dated 19 December 2025 for reconsideration of the judgmentREASONS
There is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked, because: At the outset of the application, the claimant referred to the correspondence dated 12 December 2025 from Employment Judge Wright in the first three paragraphs. The claimant then referred to the ET1 dated 17 April 2024 not being included in the bundle for the preliminary hearing on the 6 October 2025. This is not an application for that hearing outcome to be reconsidered and in any event, the Tribunal files were before Employment Judge Wright. This is not an application that the hearing before Employment Judge Heath on the 9 June 2025 be reconsidered. The references to those preliminary hearings is not understood. Furthermore, the claimant has still failed to specify the legal basis for his claim of loss of accommodation. Under the heading ‘remedy sought’, the claimant seeks that the decision of Employment Judge Leith be set aside. This application was not understood to be an application in respect of Employment Judge Leith’s Order and in any event, such an application is out of time. The second point seeks confirmation that loss of accommodation forms part of his pleaded claim. As the amendment application was refused, that is not an issue before the Tribunal. Case Number: 2302993/2024 Date: 5 January 2026 Approved by