Mrs A Offer v Andrew Palmer T/a Hollington Oak: 2302980/2017
JUDGMENT
in accordance with rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 No response having been presented in form ET3 to the office of the Employment Tribunal by the Respondent within the time limit prescribed by rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 it is adjudged as follows: The Claimant having brought a claim to the Tribunal under article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 the Tribunal finds that the Respondent was in breach of contract in not giving the Claimant notice of the termination of the employment and orders the Respondent to pay to the Claimant the sum of £705; The Tribunal declares in accordance with regulation 30 of The Working Time Regulations 1998 that the complaint of the Claimant that the Respondent has failed to pay holiday pay due to the Claimant on the termination of the employment under regulation 14(2) of such Regulations is well founded and orders the Respondent to pay to the Claimant the sum of £1,974; The Tribunal finds that the complaint by the Claimant under section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed is well founded. The Tribunal orders the Respondent to pay compensation to the Claimant in the sum of £16,047.68 of which £705 is the basic award under section 119 of the 1996 Act and £15,342.68 is the compensatory award under section 123 of that Act. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 do not apply to this award. That the Claimant was not provided with a statutory statement of terms of employment and orders in accordance with section 38 Employment Act 2002 that the Respondent do pay to the Claimant the further sum of £1,410.