Ms C Poskitt v Coppernob Ltd and Scarlett & Jo Ltd: 2302896/2017

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2302896/2017
Ms C PoskittClaimant1. Coppernob Limited 2. Scarlett & Jo LimitedRespondent
Employment Judge WrightDate 23 February 2023

JUDGMENT

The claim is struck out.

REASONS

[1]By a letter dated 31 January 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because  it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Wright 23 February 2023 Case Number: 2302896/2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms C Poskitt Respondent: 1. Coppernob Limited 2. Scarlett & Jo Limited[1]By a letter dated 31 January 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because  it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Wright 23 February 2023 Case Number: 2302896/2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms C Poskitt Respondent: 1. Coppernob Limited 2. Scarlett & Jo Limited[1]By a letter dated 31 January 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because  it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Wright 23 February 2023 Case Number: 2302896/2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms C Poskitt Respondent: 1. Coppernob Limited 2. Scarlett & Jo Limited[1]By a letter dated 31 January 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because  it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.