Mrs J Leino v P O'Halloran/GCA Chartered Accountants: 2302807/2023
JUDGMENT
The complaint of Unfair Dismissal and Redundancy Payment is struck out.REASONS
[1]By two letters dated 11 August 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of Unfair Dismissal and Redundancy Payment should not be struck out because:• For unfair Dismissal, the claimant did not have the qualifying two years’ service under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or any exceptional circumstances that provide for an exemption to the qualifying service period.• For redundancy payment, the claimant did not have the qualifying two years’ service under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or any exceptional circumstances that provide for an exemption to the qualifying service period.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of unfair dismissal and redundancy payment is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claims remains listed for hearing on 15 January 2024. _____________________________ Employment Judge McLaren Date: 11 January 2024[5]Although not listed as an issue in the Notice of Hearing, I considered thatthe claimant’s money claims were also not particularised. The respondent 1 Case No: 2302807/2023 confirmed that the claimant had been paid notice and any holiday pay due to her. She has not identified what money claims she is pursuing.[6]I therefore took the decision that these claims should also be struck out.