Mr T McCarthy v The Ratio Interiors: 2302767/2024
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years’ service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore, the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Approved by: Employment Judge Aspinall Date: 29 January 2025 Sent to the parties on Date: 31 January 2025 Case Number: 2302767/2024 Page 1 of 1 November 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr T McCarthy Respondent: The Ratio Interiors Limited RULE 22 JUDGMENT No Response having been received from the Respondent, it is the decision of the tribunal that:[1]The Respondent made unlawful deductions from the wages of the Claimant and; He is awarded the sum of £9613.32 gross.[3]The Claimant shall be responsible for any tax on the above payment. _____________________________________ Employment Judge Siddall Date 27 May 2025.[1]The sum awarded to the Claimant is varied to £8157.04 gross;[2]The sum shall be paid by the Respondent to the Claimant in monthly instalments of £650 commencing on 1 January 2026 until the entire sum has been paid; and[3]The Claimant shall be responsible for any tax on the above payment.