Mr R Anderson v Engineius: 2302663/2024
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 10 October 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 22 May it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done.[3]At a hearing on 21 October 2024, the claimant again failed to make any sufficient representations as to why his claim should not be struck out. 4.The claim is therefore struck out.[1]The claimant attended and was given a full opportunity to make arguments as to why his claim should not be struck out at the hearing on 21 October 2024. These were considered before the Judge made the decision to strike out the claimant’s claims.[2]The claimant has provided no substantive basis in his application dated 9 October 2024 to suggest this decision is unsound.[3]It is not in the interests of justice for this matter to be re-opened following the hearing on 21 October 2024 and the Judgment made. 11.6R Judgment – Reconsideration refused – respondent - rule 72 Case No: 2302663/2024