Ms T Madeisa v Slimmeria Ltd: 2302582/2017
JUDGMENT
[1]The Claimant’s claim for breach of contract is not well founded and is dismissed.[2]The Claimant’s claim under Section 93 Employment Rights Act 1996 is not well founded and is dismissed.[3]The Respondent’s counterclaim is not well founded and is dismissed.[4]The Claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages succeeds. The Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £1000. _____________________________ Employment Judge Sage Date: 1 June 2018 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is Case No: 2302582/2017 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case No: 2302582/2017 10.1 Judgment – no hearing - rule 60 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms. T. Madeisa Respondent: Slimmeria Ltd.