Ms A Boyd v Advising Communities: 2302538/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The Respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the Claimant the net sum of £3,788.15. Employment Judge Wright Dated: 2 March 2020[2]Case No: 2302538/2019 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms A Boyd Respondent: Advising Communities[4]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The claimant’s claim under s. 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 of a failure by the respondent to comply with the requirements of s. 188 is well-founded and succeeds. The Tribunal orders the respondent, by way of a protective award under s. 189(3), to pay to the claimant the sum of £3,788.15. Employment Judge Wright Date: 07/04/2020[5]Case No: 2302538/2019 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms A Boyd Respondent: Advising Communities[7]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The claimant’s claim under s. 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 of a failure by the respondent to comply with the requirements of s. 188 is well-founded and succeeds. The Tribunal orders the respondent, by way of a protective award under s. 189(3), to pay to the claimant the sum of £3,788.15 for the period of 90 days beginning on 1/5/2019.