Miss E Daglish v The Ship (Herne Bay) Ltd and others: 2302445/2017
JUDGMENT
[1]The name of the Second Respondent is amended as shown above;[2]The disability discrimination claim and the notice pay claim were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant;[3]There was no TUPE transfer to any of the Respondents;[4]The Second and Third Respondents were dismissed from the proceedings;[5]The wages claim was identified as being made against Waterfront Investments (Ramsgate) Ltd, a company which is not currently a Respondent and which is subject to a winding-up order;[6]The Claimant will notify the Tribunal office in writing by 8 June 2018 whether she wishes to pursue the wages claim, after which a decision will be made whether such a claim should be struck out on the grounds Case number 2302445/2017 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 that it has no reasonable prospect of success;[7]The claims of indirect sex discrimination and holiday pay against the First Respondent are dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant, the parties having agreed to settle those matters and all other claims arising from the employment of the Claimant by the First Respondent, upon payment of the sum of £300.REASONS
[1]By a judgement dated 22 May 2018 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations by the 8th June 2018 if she wishes to pursue her wages claim as to why the complaint of wages should not be struck out because it has no reasonable prospect of success. it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of wages is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claims will be listed in due course.