Employment Judge F SpencerIn person for claimantDate 22 March 2018
JUDGMENT
The Judgment of the Tribunal is that:(i) The Claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal under sections 100 and 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.(ii) The Claimant’s complaint of wrongful dismissal shall proceed to a hearing. A separate case management order is attached. . _____________________________ Employment Judge Spencer 11th January 2018 Case No: 2302246/2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr G See Radford Group CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Under the provisions of Rule 69 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, I hereby correct the clerical mistake in the Judgment promulgated on 22nd January 2018 by deleting the said Judgment and substituting the Judgment attached. Employment Judge Frances Spencer Dated 13th February 2018 Case Number: 2302246/17 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr Gary See v Radford Group Heard at: Croydon Employment Tribunal On: 22 March 2018 Before: Employment Judge Nash Appearances For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent Mr Wetton, HR Consultant JUDGMENT The Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is as follows:-[1]The respondent shall pay to the claimant by consent a sum equal to two months contractual notice pay being £10,941.67, which is made up of £10,833.33 for salary and £108.34 for pension contributions.[2]The respondent’s application for a preparation time order under rule 75(2) of the Tribunal Rules of Procedure is refused. ---------------------------- Note that this award is expressed as a gross figure; payment to the claimant net of all necessary deductions in respect of income tax and National Insurance contributions, provided that those deductions are duty paid to the appropriate statutory authorities, will constitute a valid discharge of this judgment.