Miss M White v Mr A Boyce: 2302097/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2302097/2024
Miss Mikaela WhiteClaimantMr Aaron BoyceRespondent
Employment Judge FowellIn person for claimantNot represented for respondentDate 31 January 2025

JUDGMENT

The respondent having failed to provide any response to the claim, judgment is given for the claimant. Employment Judge Fowell Date 13 August 2024 JUDGMENT & REASONS SENT TO THE PARTIES ON Date: 15 August 2024 Case No: 2302097/2024 Page 1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss Mikaela White Respondent: Mr Aaron Boyce Heard at: London South (by video) On: 31 January 2025 Before: Employment Judge Evans (sitting alone) Representation Claimant: in person Respondent: did not attend & was not represented JUDGMENT Rule 22 The Tribunal previously gave judgment on liability under what was then Rule 21 of the Tribunal’s Rules of procedure by a judgment dated 13 August 2024, sent to the parties on 15 August 2024. The judgment of the Tribunal in relation to remedy is as follows: Wages[1]The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in the period 16 October 2023 to 18 December 2023.[2]The respondent shall pay the claimant £1937 (one thousand nine hundred and thirty-seven pounds), which is the gross sum deducted. The claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance. Section 38 of the Employment Act 2002[3]When the proceedings were begun the respondent was in breach of his duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. There are no exceptional circumstances that make an award of an amount equal to Case No: 2302097/2024 Page 2 of 2 two weeks’ gross pay unjust or inequitable. In accordance with section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 the respondent shall therefore pay the claimant £432 (four hundred and thirty-two pounds).