Mr L Meyler v Yolo London Ltd: 2302089/2020
JUDGMENT
[1]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The respondent having failed to enter a response to this claim, Judgment for the claimant is entered as follows: The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £361.25. _____________________________ Employment Judge Ferguson Date: 5 November 2020[2]Case No: 2302089/2020 11.12 Judgment on reconsideration – no hearing - rules 70 and 73 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr L Meyler Respondent: Yolo London Ltd UPON APPLICATION by the claimant made by email dated 14 November 2020 to reconsider the judgment sent to the parties on 12 November 2020 under rule 71 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and without a hearing,[4]The Judgment sent to the parties on 12 November 2020 is varied as follows: The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £497.25. _____________________________ Employment Judge Ferguson Date: 18 November 2020[5]Case No: 2302089/2020 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr L Meyler Respondent: Yolo London Ltd[7]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 UPON the respondent informing the Tribunal by email dated 26 November 2020 that its response to the claim was submitted on 14 September 2020, AND UPON the respondent’s response not having been attached to the file at the time the judgments were issued pursuant to Rule 21, and the Tribunal records now showing that the response was submitted in time,[9]The judgments sent to the parties on 12 November 2020 and 21 November 2020 are revoked.