Mrs V Flisher and Mr B Flisher v Kent County Council: 2301945/2017 and 2301947/2017
JUDGMENT
[1]Upon the Claimants confirming that they wish to withdraw their claims of age discrimination, these claims are hereby dismissed upon withdrawal. JUDGMENTREASONS
[1]By correspondence dated 15 November 2022, the Tribunal gave the Claimants an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claims should not be struck out because they have not been actively pursued.[2]The Claimants failed to make representations in writing, and failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claims are therefore struck out. Acting Regional Employment Judge Balogun Dated: 14 December 2022 Case No: 2301945/2017 & 2301947/2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant:(1) Mrs V Flisher(2) Mr B Flisher Respondent: Kent County Council[1]By correspondence dated 15 November 2022, the Tribunal gave the Claimants an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claims should not be struck out because they have not been actively pursued.[2]The Claimants failed to make representations in writing, and failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claims are therefore struck out. Acting