Mrs S Burgess v Dr A Jafari T/a Brighton White Dental Studio: 2301809/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37 Claimant: Mrs S Burgess Respondent: Dr Arash Jafari T/A Brighton White Dental StudioREASONS
[1]By a letter dated 18 May 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of unfair dismissal should not be struck out because it It appeared that the claimant was employed for less than two years.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done. The complaint of unfair dismissal is therefore struck out. Case No:2301809/2023 P Wing P Wing FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE 6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37[3]The claimant’s remaining claims will proceed, but the hearing on 20 October 2023 is vacated for reason set out in another document. _______________ Employment Judge Heath Claimant: Mrs S Burgess Respondent: Dr Arash Jafari T/A Brighton White Dental Studio[1]By a letter dated 18 May 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of unfair dismissal should not be struck out because it It appeared that the claimant was employed for less than two years. Case No:2301809/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS 29 September 2023[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done. The complaint of unfair dismissal is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claims will proceed, but the hearing on 20 October 2023 is vacated for reason set out in another document. Employment Judge Heath Case No:2301809/2023 P Wing P Wing FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE 6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37 Claimant: Mrs S Burgess Respondent: Dr Arash Jafari T/A Brighton White Dental Studio[1]By a letter dated 18 May 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of unfair dismissal should not be struck out because it It appeared that the claimant was employed for less than two years.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done. The complaint of unfair dismissal is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claims will proceed, but the hearing on 20 October 2023 is vacated for reason set out in another document. Case No:2301809/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS 29 September 2023[1]By a letter dated 13 September 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: