Mr S Trokhymiuk v TDH Ltd T/a SUN STUDIO London: 2301699/2023
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 14 April 2023. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £2772.00 gross, calculated as 154 hours owed at the rate of £18.00 per hour.[3]The respondent must pay the claimant £2,772.00 in total.[4]The claimant is responsible for any figures owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions. Employment Judge Sudra Date: 19 June 2023 Case Number/2301699/23 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Serhii Trokhymiuk Respondent: TDH Limited t/a SUN STUDIO London Heard at: London South On: 6 May 2025 Before: Employment Judge Richter REPRESENTATION: Claimant: In person Respondent: No attendance[1]The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period 28/11/22 – 23/12/22.[2]The respondent shall pay the claimant £2,772, which is the gross sum deducted. The claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance. Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars[3]When the proceedings were begun the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. There are no exceptional circumstances that make an award of an amount equal to two weeks’ gross pay unjust or inequitable. In accordance with section 38 Employment Act 2002 the respondent shall therefore pay the claimant £1,142 in addition to the sum above. Approved by: