D Mycroft v Optima Care Ltd: 2301647/2021
JUDGMENT
[1]The claim for unauthorised deduction is dismissed upon the nonattendance of the claimant pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.REASONS
[1]The claimant is Danielle Mycroft. The respondent is Otima Care Ltd.[2]The respondent was represented by Ms S Wood, litigation consultant. Mr B Harb attended to give evidence on behalf of the respondent.[3]The claimant failed to attend the hearing.[4]Prior to making the decision the tribunal noted that:a. There was no apparent explanation for the claimant’s non-attendance.b. Attempts were made by the tribunal to contact the claimant by telephone but the call went through to a voicemail service.c. No reasons for non-attendance were given in advance of the hearing.d. The hearing was due to start at 2pm and was listed for 2 hours. The claimant did not attend at any time during the hearing window.e. No witness statement had been supplied by the claimant ahead of the hearing. 10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017 Case No: 2301647/21