Miss E S K Thandi v Stratford & Park HR and Consultancy Firm and CoventGate Law: 2301634/2022
JUDGMENT
The complaint of Unfair Dismissal and Redundancy Payment is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 18 June 2022 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of Unfair Dismissal and Redundancy Payment should not be struck out because• The claimant did not have the qualifying two years’ service under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or any exceptional circumstances that provide for an exemption to the qualifying service period.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of Unfair Dismissal and Redundancy Payment is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claims continue. _____________________________ Employment Judge Tsamados Date: 12 October 2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS London South Employment Tribunal (papers) 10th May 2023 Reference number 2301634-2022 Claimant: Ektaveen Simran Kaur Thandi Respondents: Stratford & Park HR and Consultancy[2]CoventGate Law Before: Judge M Aspinall (sitting alone as an Employment Judge) Appearances: None[1]The claims made by the Claimant are struck out as they have not been actively pursued.[2]By a letter dated 5 April 2023 the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why her claims should not be struck out because she had not actively pursued them.[3]The Claimant was given until 3 May 2023 to make such representations or to request a hearing. She has not made any such representations in writing or requested a hearing at which she could give her reasons why her claims ought not to be struck out. Judge M Aspinall Wednesday, 10th May 2023 2301634-2022 Miss Ektaveen Simran Kaur Thandi -v- Stratford & Park HR and Consultancy Firm: 10-05-2023 Judgment Page 1 of 1