Miss M Karuppannan v N Draper: 2301572/2021

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2301572/2021
Miss M KaruppannanClaimantNigel draperRespondent
Employment Judge McLarenIn person for claimantDate 11 August 2022

JUDGMENT

The complaint of Unfair Dismissal is struck out.

REASONS

[1]By a letter dated 05 May 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of Unfair Dismissal should not be struck out because The claimant did not have the qualifying two years’ service under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or any exceptional circumstances that provide for an exemption to the qualifying service period.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of Unfair Dismissal is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claims continue. _____________________________ Employment Judge McLaren Date: 07 February 2022 Case No: 2301572/2021 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms Mangayarkarasi Karuppannan Respondent: Great Food 2U Ltd Heard at: London South (remote hearing) On: 11 August 2022 Before: Employment Judge B Smith (sitting alone) Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Nigel Draper (Company Director)[1]Great Food 2U Ltd is substituted as the Respondent in place of Nigel Draper.[2]The claim for unlawful deduction from wages is well-founded. The Respondent shall pay the Claimant the sum of £846 (gross).[3]The claim for notice pay is well-founded. The Respondent shall pay the Claimant the sum of £4,230 (gross).