Mrs C Dodson v Gatwick Hotels Ltd and Silver Hopkins Hotel Management Ltd: 2301513/2017
[2]Silver Hopkins Hotel Management Limited Heard at: London South On: Tuesday, 19 March 2019 Before: Acting Regional Employment Judge P Davies Representation Claimant: Mr A Gloag (Counsel) For 1 & 2 Respondents: No attendance JUDGMENT[1]The Claimant was unfairly and wrongfully dismissed by the Second Respondents, Silver Hopkins Hotel Management Ltd and the Second Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £9379.68. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 as amended do not apply.[2]The First and Second Respondents do pay to the Claimant sum of £2,342.08 for failure to consult pursuant to the TUPE transfer duties. Acting Regional Employment Judge P Davies Date 18th April 2019 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case No. 2301513/2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs C Dodson Respondents: 1) Gatwick Hotels Limited 2) Silver Hopkins Hotel Management Limited Heard at: London South On: Tuesday, 19 March 2019 Before: Acting Regional Employment Judge P Davies Representation Claimant: Mr A Gloag (Counsel) For 1 & 2 Respondents: No attendance AMENDED JUDGMENT[1]The Claimant was unfairly and wrongfully dismissed by the Second Respondents, Silver Hopkins Hotel Management Ltd and the Second Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £9379.68. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 as amended do not apply. The reason for dismissal was that the Claimant was redundant.[2]The First and Second Respondents do pay to the Claimant sum of £2,342.08 for failure to consult pursuant to the TUPE transfer duties. Acting Regional Employment Judge P Davies Date 18th April 2019 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Amended on the 23rd April 2020 AMENDED JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 23 April 2020