Miss R Smith v Medway Stoves and Fires Ltd: 2301417/2018
JUDGMENT
Upon the Respondent’s Response not having been accepted and the Respondent not having applied to review that decision and having regard to Rule 21, Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the Judgment of the Tribunal is that:- The claims succeed and the remedy to which the Claimant is entitled will be determined at a remedy hearing, which will be listed shortly. Employment Judge Freer Date: 15 October 2018 Case No: 2301417/18 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms Rachel Smith Respondent: London Community Rehabilitation Company Heard at: London South On: 12 April 2019 Before: Employment Judge Martin Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: No Response accepted. Mr Bell attended JUDGMENT ON REMEDY[1]No response having been received within the statutory time period and the Respondent not complying with the order of the Tribunal dated 8 March 2019 which required it to send in writing reasons why the Response was entered late no later than 22 March 2019 the judgment on liability dated 15 October 2019 stands.[2]The Tribunal finds the Claimant to have been unfairly dismissed. The Claimant has received maternity allowance and credit has been given for this.[3]The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant a basic award of £459[4]The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant a compensatory award of £9,160.00. _____________________________ Employment Judge Martin Date 12 April 2019 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case No: 2301417/18 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms Rachel Smith Respondent: Mr K Bell T/a Medway Stoves and Fires Heard at: London South On: 12 April 2019 Before: Employment Judge Martin Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: No Response accepted. Mr Bell attended AMENDED JUDGMENT ON REMEDY[1]No response having been received within the statutory time period and the Respondent not complying with the order of the Tribunal dated 8 March 2019 which required it to send in writing reasons why the Response was entered late no later than 22 March 2019 the judgment on liability dated 15 October 2019 stands.[2]The Tribunal finds the Claimant to have been unfairly dismissed. The Claimant has received maternity allowance and credit has been given for this.[3]The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant a basic award of £459[4]The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant a compensatory award of £9,160.00.