Mr N Simoes v C Palace living Ltd: 2301337/2020
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 1.[1]The Respondent has failed to present a response to the Claimant’s claim.[2]The breach of contract claim in respect of the failure to pay one month’s salary pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant damages in the net sum of £2,083.28. .REASONS
[1]In his ET1 the Claimant provided a calculation of what the Respondent owed him. He stated that this was £2,083.28 in respect of net unpaid salary for the month he worked prior to the termination of his employment with the respondent.[2]The ET1 was sent to the respondent at its registered address on the 24th June 2020. The Respondent has not submitted an ET3 in respect of the Claimant’s claim.[3]In these circumstances, I considered that it was in accordance with the overriding objective and dealing with the case fairly and justly, proportionate to the complexity, avoiding delay and saving expense (including saving Tribunal resources) to give judgment in accordance with rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.