Mrs C Dennington and others v Sesderma UK Ltd: 2301224/2017 and others
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 69 The Respondent having failed to enter a Response, I issued the following Judgment. The Claimant, Charlotte Smith[1]The Claimant’s complaints of unauthorised deductions from pay and accrued holiday pay entitlements are well founded and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the total sum of £2489.19. The Claimant, Kamal Grewal Watson[2]The Claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from pay is well founded and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £1871.98.[3]The Claimant’s claim for accrued holiday pay entitlement is well founded and the Respondent is ordered t pay the Claimant the sum of £61.23. The Claimant, Mohammed Butt[4]The Claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from pay is well founded and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £1484.00[5]The Claimant’s claim for breach of contract is well founded and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £155 representing expenses owed to the clamant The Claimant, Christine Dennington[6]The Claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from pay is well founded and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £3000.[7]The Claimant’s claim for breach of contract is well founded and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £212.89 representing expenses owed to the clamant[8]The Claimant’s claim for accrued holiday pay entitlement is well founded and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £961.54. CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of Rule 69, the Judgment sent to the parties on 31 July 2017, is corrected as set out in block type at paragraph 6 of the Judgment to read: IN PARAGRAPH 6 – AFTER THE WORDS THE SUM OF AT THE END OF LINE 2 ADD £3000 Signed__________________________ Employment Judge Hall-Smith Dated 2 October 2017 Important note to parties: Any dates for the filing of appeals or reviews are not changed by this certificate of correction. These time limits still run from the date of the original judgment or order, or original judgment with reasons, when appealing.