Ms D Chan v Becave Ltd: 2301221/2022
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 08 April 2022. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £3296.16 gross.[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £347.20.[4]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £10.63.[5]The respondent has failed to make the correct contributions in regard to the claimants pension scheme and must pay the claimant £70.13[6]The respondent must pay the claimant £3724.12 in total. _____________________________ Employment Judge Wright Date: 21 September 2022 Case Number: 2301221/2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms D Chan Respondent: Becave LTD UPON APPLICATION made by letter dated 19 October 2022 to reconsider the judgment under rule 71 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 dated 06 October 2022 The rule 21 judgment is varied as follows:[2]The amount the respondent must pay to the claimant in respect of their holiday entitlement is varied to £471.79[3]The total amount the respondent must pay the claimant is varied to £4,185.28