Mr C Pinto v T Brown Group: 2301048/2020
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 15 March 2020. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. Case No: 2301048/2020 11.6C Judgment – Reconsideration refused – claimant - rule 72 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr C Pinto Respondent: T Brown GroupREASONS
The Respondent has provided evidence that it did file an ET3 and Grounds of Resistance on 21 April 2020, prior to the deadline of 22 April 2020. In error, this was not recorded on the Tribunal system. In the circumstances the Respondent’s response ought to have been accepted. The Rule 21 judgment is therefore revoked. Employment Judge Keogh Date 27 May 2022 Employment Judge Keogh Date 30 March 2022 Case Number: 2301048/2020 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr C Pinto Respondent: T Brown Group JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS[1]By an order dated 11 July 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because• the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 11 July 2022.• it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.[3]The hearing fixed for 07-10 February 2023 will not take place.