Miss T Scott-Preston v A Long: 2301038/2022
JUDGMENT
The complaint of Unfair Dismissal is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 26 January 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of Unfair Dismissal should not be struck out because,• The claimant did not have the qualifying two years’ service under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or any exceptional circumstances that provide for an exemption to the qualifying service period• The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of Unfair Dismissal is therefore struck out.• The claimant’s remaining claims continue. _____________________________ Employment Judge Khalil Date: 20 February 2023[2]Case No: 2301038/2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss T Scott-Preston Respondent: Ms A Long Heard at: Croydon (via CVP) On: 8 November 2023 Before: Employment Judge Leith Representation Claimant: No attendance or representation Respondent: In person (only entitled to participate to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge, in accordance with rule 21(3) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure)[4]The complaints of breach of contract, unauthorised deduction from wages and failure to provide written pay statements are dismissed upon the non-attendance of the Claimant (rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure).