Ms D Martin v Hugh Henry Ltd: 2300840/2017
JUDGMENT
[1]By consent, the claim for unfair dismissal is well founded and it succeeds on procedural grounds[2]Had a fair procedure been followed there is a 66% chance that the Claimant would have been selected for redundancy[3]The Claimant is awarded a total sum of £6818.79 by way of compensatory award (and no basic award as a redundancy payment had been paid)[4]By consent, the Respondent made unlawful deductions from the salary of the Claimant in relation to three days sick pay and she is awarded the sum of £225.[5]The claim that the Claimant suffered less favourable treatment contrary to regulation 5 of the Part-time workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 succeeds.[6]The total monetary amount awarded to the Claimant is £7043.79.[7]The amount of the prescribed element is £3599.[8]The period to which the prescribed element relates is 13 February 2017 to 27 September 2017.[9]The total monetary award exceeds the prescribed element by £3444.79.