Miss D Curran v Rose Homes c/o Mr M Stevens and Mrs S Parr and Mrs S Parr: 2300715/2021
JUDGMENT
The decision of the tribunal is that the claim for unfair dismissal is struck out under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it has not been actively pursued.REASONS
[1]The Claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal against the Respondents on 19 February 2021. A response was filed by Ms Davis alleging that the wrong persons had been named as employer.[2]On 23 November 2021 standard case management orders were sent out and the case was listed for hearing on 25 April 2022. Case Number: 2300715/21[3]On 17 January 2022 the Respondent advised the tribunal that the case management orders had not been complied with and that the Claimant had indicated that she was unsure whether she would continue with her claim.[4]A letter dated 18 January 2022 warned the Claimant that the tribunal was considering striking her claim out unless she replied to correspondence.[5]On 30 March 2022 a letter was sent by the tribunal to the claimant warning her that her claim would be struck out unless she replied to earlier letters, including the letter dated 18 January 2022, by 6 April 2022. No reply was received from the Claimant.[6]The Claimant did not attend the video hearing listed for today and Ms Davis requested that the claim be struck out.[7]The Claimant has not engaged with correspondence from the tribunal and has not complied with the case management orders. It also appears that in any event the claim may have been brought against the wrong parties. The Claimant has not responded to correspondence relating to this.[8]The claim is therefore struck out on the grounds that it has not been actively pursued.