H Pendered-Mazer and others v Hextransforma Healthcare Ltd (in Administration): 2300067/2022 and others H Pendered-Mazer and others v Hextransforma Healthcare Ltd (in Administration): 2300067/2022 and others
JUDGMENT
The claims are struck out.REASONS
[1]The name of the Respondent to each of these claims is amended to be “Hextransforma Healthcare Limited (in Administration)”.[2]The Tribunal wrote to the claimants on 11 June 2024 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claims. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that: the claims had not been actively pursued.[3]The letter gave the claimants an opportunity to explain why the claims should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimants had not replied by the reply date of 18 June 2024.[4]I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claims under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the claims. This is because the claims have not been actively pursued.[5]The claims are therefore struck out. Approved by: