Mr M Rusu v JS White Construction UK Ltd and J White: 2300009/2023
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]By an Order dated 09 May 2023, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations as to why the Claimant’s claim should not succeed or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because:• the respondent had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 09 May 2023.• it has not been actively pursued.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. _____________________________ Employment Judge Burge 10 October 2023 Case No: 2300009/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr M Rusu Respondent(1): JS White Construction UK Ltd Respondent (2): Jonathan White Heard at: Croydon On: 25 September 2024 Before: Employment Judge Liz Ord Representation: Claimant: In person Respondents: Not attending