Ms R Pendered v Media Zoo Holdings Ltd: 2216702/2023
JUDGMENT
The Claimant’s claims of direct sex discrimination and direct disability discrimination are struck out.REASONS
The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £500 as a condition of continuing to pursue her claim of direct sex discrimination and a further deposit of £500 as a condition of continuing to pursue her claim of direct disability discrimination following a preliminary hearing held on 10 December 2024. The Order was sent to the claimant on 20 December 2024 The claimant has failed to pay this deposit. The complaints of direct sex and disability discrimination are therefore struck out under rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. This does not affect the claims of harassment related to sex and/or disability or her claim for unfair dismissal. _____________________________ Employment Judge Spencer 5 March 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 7 March 2025 ........................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 2216702/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms R Pendered Respondent: Media Zoo Holdings Ltd JUDGMENT The complaint of harassment related to disability is struck out. REASONS[1]By a letter dated 6 March 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of disability related harassment should not be struck out because:• the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 10 December 2024 sent to the parties on 20 December 2024.• it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of disability related harassment is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claim(s) remains listed for hearing. Approved by: