Mr S Fatubarin v Universal Commercial Guarding: 2216701/2024
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 21 November 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because• the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 5 September 2024:• He not sent to the Respondent a schedule of loss• He had not confirmed to the Tribunal, by 1 November 2024, that he had complied with the other directions in that order, despite EJ Nicolle asking him to confirm that, by letter of 28 October 2024.• it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant responded on 28 November 2024, saying, “Please do not strike out my case as I intend to pursue to its conclusion. I am requesting that the schedule of losses will be disclosed at the hearing.” He did not propose to send a schedule of loss to the Respondent promptly. He did not confirm that he had complied, or would comply, with any of the other directions set out in the 5 September 2024 order. He failed to make any sufficient representations why the claim should not be struck out, nor did he request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.[3]The hearing fixed for 22 January 2025 will not take place.