Mr G Greco v Vinci Construction: 2215341/2023 and 3315336/2023
JUDGMENT
On hearing Mr. J Frederick (solicitor Advocate) for the Claimant and Mr. C Hill Counsel for the Respondent:[1]The Respondent’s application for costs under rule 76 is refused.[2]There was no application for wasted costs under rule 80 before the Tribunal.REASONS
[1]Has a rule 80 wasted costs application been made?[2]Did any of the below conduct meet the threshold to trigger consideration of a costs aware under rules 76 (1) (a), (b), (c) and/or 76 (2)? Namely: 2.1. Withdrawing the claim on 7 February 2024 when it could have been withdrawn earlier knowing that the Respondent had instructed counsel and incurred the brief fee;