Ms M-E Hurley v The Chartered Institute of Taxation and the Association of Taxation Technicians: 2214563/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear the claims of direct race discrimination pursuant to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 (the EQA), direct disability discrimination pursuant to S 13 of the EQA, discrimination arising from disability pursuant to S 15 of the EQA, failure to make reasonable adjustments on account of the disability pursuant to S 20, 21 and 39 of the EQA, indirect sex discrimination pursuant to S 19 of the EQA and victimisation pursuant to S 27 of the EQA and nor would it be appropriate for the Tribunal to exercise its discretion on the grounds that it would be just and equitable to do so, pursuant to S123 (1) (b) of the EQA.[2]Further, had jurisdiction existed the claim would, in any event, have been struck out under Rule 38 (1) (c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 (the Rules) for noncompliance with Orders of the Tribunal.[3]It would not, however, have been struck out separately on the ground that it had not been actively pursued actively pursued pursuant to Rule 38 (1) (d) - 1 - Case Number: 2214563/2023REASONS
[4]Oral reasons were given to the parties. The Claimant requested written reasons which will be provided to the parties as soon as reasonably practicable.