R Anyaneto and Miss K Ostojic v Arloid Automation Ltd: 2208515/2023

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2208515/2023
Richard AnyanetoClaimantArloid Automation Ltd At: Central London Employment TribunalRespondent
Employment Judge E BurnsDate 31 July 2023

JUDGMENT

[1]The respondent has failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance in this case.[2]Having considered the ET1, EJ E Burns has decided that a determination of the claim can properly be made without a hearing and the Judgment of the Tribunal, made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, is as set out below.[3]The respondent has unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant as follows: 3.1. Outstanding wages for Richard Anyaneto £10,300.42[4]The tribunal orders the respondent to pay to the claimant £10,300.42 gross (which should be paid subject to deductions for any tax and national insurance for which the respondent should account to HMRC). __________________ Employment Judge E Burns 31 July 2023 Sent to the parties on: 01/08/2023 For the Tribunal: Case No: 2208515/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss Katarina Ostojic Respondent: Arloid Automation Ltd At: Central London Employment Tribunal Before: Employment Judge E Burns[1]The respondent has failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance in this case.[2]Having considered the ET1, EJ E Burns has decided that a determination of the claim can properly be made without a hearing and the Judgment of the Tribunal, made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, is as set out below.[3]The respondent has unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant as follows:[4]Outstanding wages for Miss Katarina Ostojic £5,753.14.[5]The tribunal orders the respondent to pay to the claimant £5,753.14 gross (which should be paid subject to deductions for any tax and national insurance for which the respondent should account to HMRC).